Motive v. Opportunity: Fountain Pens

Waller, Robert A. “WOMEN AND THE TYPEWRITER DURING THE FIRST FIFTY YEARS, 1873-1923.” Studies in Popular Culture 9, no. 1 (1986): 39–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23412899.

Hoke, Donald. “The Woman and the Typewriter: A Case Study in Technological Innovation and Social Change.” Business and Economic History 8 (1979): 76–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23702593.

Macrakis, Kristie, and Jason Lye. “The Hidden Past of Invisible Ink.” American Scientist 102, no. 3 (2014): 198–205. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43707185.

“Improvement in Fountain Pens.” Scientific American 17, no. 13 (1867): 196–196. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26028408.

Daniels, Maygene. “The Ingenious Pen: American Writing Implements from the Eighteenth Century to the Twentieth.” The American Archivist 43, no. 3 (1980): 312–24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40292316.

Roberts, Len. “Learning to Write in Cursive with a Fountain Pen.” The American Poetry Review 30, no. 2 (2001): 42–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27783697.

Jacobs, Alan. Review of From Cursive to Cursor, by Dennis Baron. The New Atlantis, no. 27 (2010): 85–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43152531.

Baron, D. E. A Better Pencil : Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution; Oxford University Press: Oxford ;, 2009.

SWORD, HELEN, and Selina Tusitala Marsh. “On the Ground: ANALOG TOOLS.” In Writing with Pleasure, 11:131–51. Princeton University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.19255069.12.

Cohen, Michael. “A Fountain Pen of Good Repute.” New England Review (1990-) 31, no. 4 (2010): 176–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27920420.

Langbein, John H. “Substantial Compliance with the Wills Act.” Harvard Law Review 88, no. 3 (1975): 489–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340322.

Orth, John V. “WILLS ACT FORMALITIES: HOW MUCH COMPLIANCE IS ENOUGH?” Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal 43, no. 1 (2008): 73–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23802532.

Dawn Watkins. “The (Literal) Death of the Author and the Silencing of the Testator’s Voice.” Law and Literature 24, no. 1 (2012): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1525/lal.2012.24.1.59.